Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Unstable Employees, Direct Threats and the ADA


I opened my email this morning to find the following question from fellow blogger The Evil HR Lady:

As you probably know, I’m an avid reader, even though I’ve never lived in Ohio, although I have been to two weddings there, so that must count for something.


I've been reading about Jared Lee Loughner--the Arizona shooter and came across the e-mails written by a class member who thought Loughner was dangerous here: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2011/01/jared-loughners-behavior-recor.html?hpid=topnews


My question for you, the employment lawyer, is given ADA protections, if I notice an employee becoming increasingly unstable, what can I do about it?


I’d love to read your thoughts on this.

Instead of responding directly, I thought I’d share my thoughts with everyone.

The ADA contains a specific exception for employees who pose a “direct threat.” The statute defines “direct threat” as “a significant risk to the health or safety of others that cannot be eliminated by reasonable accommodation.” The ADA’s regulations require that the determination that an individual poses a direct threat must be “based on an individualized assessment of the individual’s present ability to safely perform the essential functions of the job.” Employers must base this assessment on either “a reasonable medical judgment that relies on the most current medical knowledge” or “on the best available objective evidence.” In making this determination, employers should rely on the following four factors:
  1. The duration of the risk;
  2. The nature and severity of the potential harm;
  3. The likelihood that the potential harm will occur; and
  4. The imminence of the potential harm.
Palmer v. Circuit Court of Cook County (7th Cir. 1997) succinctly explains the Hobson’s choice employers face when deciding whether to retain a potentially violent employee. Since I can’t say it any better, I’ll just quote from the opinion:
The [ADA] does not require an employer to retain a potentially violent employee. Such a requirement would place the employer on a razor’s edge—in jeopardy of violating the Act if it fired such an employee, yet in jeopardy of being deemed negligent if it retained him and he hurt someone. The Act protects only “qualified” employees, that is, employees qualified to do the job for which they were hired; and threatening other employees disqualifies one….
It is true that an employer has a statutory duty to make a “reasonable accommodation” to an employee’s disability, that is, an adjustment in working conditions to enable the employee to overcome his disability, if the employer can do this without “undue hardship.” … But we cannot believe that this duty runs in favor of employees who commit or threaten to commit violent acts…. The retention of such an employee would cause justifiable anxiety to coworkers and supervisors. It would be unreasonable to demand of the employer either that it force its employees to put up with this or that it station guards to prevent the mentally disturbed employee from getting out of hand.
To sum up and answer the question posed, employers faced with a legitimate and potentially dangerous employee need not wait for the powder keg to explode. Instead, employers can treat the employee as a “direct threat” and separate the individual from employment.
A few additional practical points to consider:
  1. Prior to the termination, obtain written statements from co-workers, supervisors, and managers documenting all threatening behavior.
  2. The severity of threat is proportional to the duration of the risk. In other words, the more real the risk the less amount of time you have to allow it in your workplace.
  3. Typically, I’m opposed to security escorts of terminated employees. The termination of an employee who poses a direct threat for violence is the exception.
  4. Consider carrying out the termination as late in the work day, and work week, as possible. This timing will create and artificial cooling-off period and help limit the risk that the employee returns to do harm.
  5. Put the local police department on notice. Also consider a private security detail for a period of time until you are reasonably certain the employee is not going to return to cause harm.
Finally, my thought and prayers are with everyone in Tucson as they mourn, fight for their lives, cope with what happened, and start the healing process.



Presented by Kohrman Jackson & Krantz, with offices in Cleveland and Columbus. For more information, contact Jon Hyman, a partner in our Labor & Employment group, at (216) 736-7226 or jth@kjk.com.

5 comments:

  1. Thank you for this. Very clear and actionable. Really helpful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bunnie, thanks so much for always expanding a director's knowledge. Your posts always cover a relevant and often critical topic that some of us haven't tracked down. You are a great resource for things that I didn't even know I needed yet.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Many moons ago when I worked for the American Heart Association, there was a young girl (barely in her 20's) that had some "growing up" to do. She chose to do this by consistenly coming in late to work - if she bothered to come in at all. Then we found whiskey bottles in her trash can! It seemed like upper management thought the problem would just go away. She had been fine for a couple of years but was, sadly, no longer longer a fit for the job. This isn't an extreme case but I wonder now if the higher-ups just didn't know how to correctly deal with the situation so chose to do nothing at all. I appreciate your posting this, Bunnie, so it can let everyone know about their legal options.
    Betsy Baker
    Your Grant Authority

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mengobati Kutil KemaluanDan cara pengobatan ini tentunya akan lebih menyakitkan dari pengobatan sebelumnya, tak jarang juga manakutkan penderitanya. Sinar lase akan diarahkan pada alat kelamin untuk membakar kutil-kutil yang bertumbuh. untuk cara pemesanana silahkan kunjungweb site ini

    obat wasir tradisional untuk ibu menyusuiJika Anda sedang mencari obat alami untuk wasir ada beberapa hal yang dapat Anda lakukan untuk meringankan rasa sakit, iritasi dan ketidaknyamanan, serta ingin memperbaiki masalah Anda secara definitif.

    obat keluar nanah dari kemaluanJika kedua penyakit ini menyerang ibu hamil, maka bayi dalam kandungan memiliki resiko yang besar untuk terinfeksi saat proses persalinan. Ketiga, munculnya penyakit ini adalah akibat kurangnya kesadaran akan pentingnya memiliki hubungan seksual yang sehat dengan pemakaian kondom atau tidak berganti-ganti pasangan saat melakukan hubungan seks.untuk cara pemesanana silahkan kunjungklik disin

    Obat Kutil Di Kemaluan PriaApakah Pengobatan Herbal Adalah Cara Terbaik Untuk Menyembuhkan Kutil Kelamin?untuk cara pemesanana silahkan kunjungblog kami

    obat keluar nanah dari kemaluanYang kedua, pastikan pasangan seksual anda sehat dan tidak memiliki masalah dengan penyakit menular. Dan ketiga, cobalah setia dengan satu pasangan dan hindari bergonta-ganti pasangan saat berhubungan seks.untuk cara pemesanana silahkan kunjungklik disin

    Obat Kutil Di KemaluanSeperti yang kita tahu bahwa penyebab utama penyakit kutil kelamin ini adalah Virus Papilloma yang jika tidak dikendalikan maka akan mudah datang kembali. untuk cara pemesanana silahkan kunjungsitus kami

    Obat Kutil Di Sekitar KelaminEkstrak obat herbal ini dapat dengan mudah dicerna tubuh dan menyembuhkan secara alami dari dalam, tanpa efek samping seperti pengobatan kimia lainya. untuk cara pemesanana silahkan kunjungblog ini

    ReplyDelete